Greenpeace International vs. Energy Transfer

03 Jun Greenpeace International vs. Energy Transfer

London, (Oilandgaspress) Greenpeace International’s landmark anti-SLAPP lawsuit took a major step forward today when the Amsterdam District Court rejected Energy Transfer’s latest attempt to avoid accountability for its unlawful actions, including back-to-back abusive lawsuits filed in the US. Netherlands-based Greenpeace International is seeking legal recognition that Energy Transfer has acted and continues to act unlawfully, as well as relief from the resulting harm.

Today the Amsterdam District Court entirely rejected Energy Transfer’s preliminary plea seeking dismissal of Greenpeace International’s anti-SLAPP case, arguing that the Amsterdam District Court lacks jurisdiction, and in the alternative, asking for a stay (suspension) of the proceedings until the final outcome of the case in North Dakota.[1] The court heard arguments on this plea on 16 April 2026. Previously, the North Dakota District Court and state Supreme Court both denied Energy Transfer’s request to halt Greenpeace International’s anti-SLAPP lawsuit.[2]

The Amsterdam District Court gave Energy Transfer six weeks to file its defence on the merits under Dutch law.[3] In the meantime, the company has been ordered to pay Greenpeace International €1,495 in costs.

Energy Transfer’s abusive lawsuits against Greenpeace International and the Greenpeace organisations in the US (Greenpeace Inc. and Greenpeace Fund) remain blatant attempts to silence free speech, erase Indigenous leadership of the Standing Rock movement, and punish solidarity with the ongoing, peaceful resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline.[4] These are clear-cut examples of SLAPPs — lawsuits attempting to bury nonprofits and activists in legal fees and ultimately silence dissent.

Information Source: Read More