Car manufacturers and association fined €458m over end-of-life vehicles recycling cartel
The Commission has fined 15 major car manufacturers and the European Automobiles Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA) a total of around €458 million for participating in a long-lasting cartel concerning end-of-life vehicle recycling. Mercedes-Benz was not fined, as it revealed the cartel to the Commission under the leniency programme. All companies admitted their involvement in the cartel and agreed to settle the case.
An End-of-Life Vehicle (‘ELV’) is a car that is no longer fit for use, either due to age, wear and tear, or damage. These vehicles are dismantled and processed for recycling, recovery, and disposal.
The goal is to minimise waste and recover valuable materials like metal, plastic, and glass. To further support EU’s decarbonisation and recycling ambition, today the Commission has proposed a flexibility measure to help manufacturers comply with their CO2 emission targets between 2025 and 2027 for new cars and vans. It has also proposed, as part of the EU’s cohesion policy mid-term review, funding incentives for the deployment of recharging infrastructure. Finally, the Commission has launched a fact-finding exercise on how European companies procure and recycle certain critical raw materials, to support greater industry cooperation in this field in line with EU competition rules.
The infringement
The Commission’s investigation revealed that, for over 15 years, 16 major car manufacturers (including Mercedes, which was not fined) and ACEA entered into anticompetitive agreements and engaged in concerted practices related to the recycling of ELVs.
In particular, the Commission found that the parties colluded on two aspects:
- they agreed not to pay car dismantlers for processing ELVs. In particular, they agreed to consider the recycling of ELVs to be a sufficiently profitable business, and therefore not to remunerate car dismantlers for their services (so-called “Zero-Treatment-Cost” strategy). The companies also shared commercially sensitive information on their individual agreements with car dismantlers and coordinated their behaviour towards dismantlers;
- they agreed not to promote how much of an ELV can be recycled, recovered and reused and how much recycled material is used in new cars. Their goal was to prevent consumers from considering recycling information when choosing a car, which could lower the pressure on companies to go beyond legal requirements.
Under Directive 2000/53/EC on ELVs, the last owner of an ELV must be able to dispose of it at no cost with a dismantler and if needed, car manufacturers are obliged to bear the costs. Moreover, consumers are required to be informed about the recycling performance of new cars.
The investigation found that ACEA was the facilitator of the cartel, having organised numerous meetings and contacts between car manufacturers involved in the cartel.
The Commission’s investigation revealed the existence of a single and continuous infringement in the European Economic Area (‘EEA’), spanning over 15 years, from 29 May 2002 to 4 September 2017. The following table details the companies involved in the infringement and the duration of each company’s involvement:
| Company | Start | End |
| BMW | 29 May 2002 | 4 September 2017 |
| Ford | 29 May 2002 | 4 September 2017 |
| Honda | 29 May 2002 | 4 September 2017 |
| Hyundai / Kai | 2 March 2006 | 4 September 2017 |
| Jaguar Land Rover | 23 September 2008 | 4 September 2017 |
| – Tata as parent | 23 September 2008 | 4 September 2017 |
| Mazda | 13 September 2006 | 4 September 2017 |
| – Ford as parent | 13 September 2006 | 18 November 2008 |
| Mercedes Benz | 29 May 2002 | 4 September 2017 |
| Mitsubishi | 29 May 2002 | 4 September 2017 |
| Opel | 29 May 2002 | 4 September 2017 |
| – General Motors as parent | 10 July 2009 | 31 July 2017 |
| Renault / Nissan | 29 May 2002 | 4 September 2017 |
| Stellantis | 29 May 2002 | 4 September 2017 |
| Suzuki | 29 May 2002 | 4 September 2017 |
| Toyota | 29 May 2002 | 4 September 2017 |
| Volkswagen | 29 May 2002 | 4 September 2017 |
| Volvo | 29 May 2002 | 4 September 2017 |
| – Ford as parent | 29 May 2002 | 2 August 2010 |
| – Geely as parent | 3 August 2010 | 4 September 2017 |
| ACEA | 29 May 2002 | 4 September 2017 |
The Commission coordinated its investigation with the UK Competition and Markets Authority (‘CMA’). Today, the CMA also adopted a decision concerning the same practice for breaches of UK competition law.
Fines
The fines were set on the basis of the Commission’s 2006 Guidelines on fines. In setting the fines, the Commission took into account various elements, including the number of cars concerned by the infringement, the nature of the infringement, its geographic scope and its duration. When setting the fine, the Commission also took into account the lesser involvement in the infringement of Honda, Mazda, Mitsubishi and Suzuki. It also granted a reduction to Renault since evidence showed that Renault had explicitly asked for an exemption from the agreement not to advertise the use of recycled material in new cars.
The breakdown of the fines imposed on each party is as follows:
| Company | Reduction under the Leniency Notice | Fine |
| Mercedes-Benz | 100% | €0 |
| Stellantis | 50% | €74 934 000 |
| Mitsubishi | 30% | €4 150 000 |
| Ford | 20% | €41 462 000 |
| BMW | €24 587 000 | |
| Honda | €5 040 000 | |
| Hyundai / Kia | €11 950 000 | |
| Jaguar Land Rover / Tata | €1 637 000 | |
| Mazda | €5 006 000 | |
| – Of which jointly and severally with Ford | €1 034 000 | |
| Renault / Nissan | €81 461 000 | |
| Opel | 50% | €24 530 000 |
| – Of which jointly and severally with GM | €13 659 000 | |
| GM solely | €17 075 000 | |
| Suzuki | €5 471 000 | |
| Toyota | €23 553 000 | |
| Volkswagen | €127 696 000 | |
| Volvo | €8 890 000 | |
| – Of which jointly and severally with Ford | €3 901 000 | |
| – Of which jointly and severally with Geely | €4 419 000 | |
| ACEA | €500 000 |
Background
Information Source: Read More
Oil and gas press covers, Energy Monitor, Climate, Gas,Renewable, Oil and Gas, Wind, Biomass, Sustainability, Oil Price, LPG, Solar, Marine, Aviation, Fuel, Hydrogen, Electric ,EV, Gas,
