Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Pro-Whales Group ACK for Whales Urges Revocation of Vineyard Wind Project

ACK for Whales Asks Energy Secretary Burgum to reopen case and cancel permits

Government rushed to issue permits through faulty review and process

Vineyard Wind and Government never disclosed or studied blade failure issues

NANTUCKET, Mass.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–ACK for Whales, the non-profit grassroots Nantucket group leading the fight against offshore wind turbines, said Monday it has asked U.S. Secretary of the Interior Douglas Burgum to reopen the permit approvals for the Vineyard Wind project to review significant gaps in the process, and to revoke the permits.


When Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) in January 2025 granted Vineyard Wind’s Revised Construction and Operations Plan (COP), it failed to consider or discuss the threat of turbine blade breaks or lightning strikes on turbines, two problems that have beset Vineyard Wind’s construction, ACK For Whales said in its letter.

Last July, a blade snapped on a Vineyard Wind turbine off Nantucket, strewing 70 tons of jagged and potentially toxic blade shards from Cape Cod to Montauk Point in New York. In 2025, the same turbine was struck by lightning and further damaged.

“BOEM consistently ignored data throughout the permitting process because it was rushing to carry out the partisan agenda of it political overlords,” said ACK for Whales President Vallorie Oliver. “Even after the blade failure last year and subsequent confirmation of the same untested Haliade X blades failing elsewhere, BOEM doubled down and rushed its approval, failing again to do its job properly.”

As the letter to Burgum notes,

More than 36% of wind turbines fail less than three times; however, most wind turbines suffered five to nine failures during observation. As such, turbine failure is a well established problem. The revised COP does not appear to examine the possibility that regular turbine failure events have the capacity to introduce significant environmental degradation (i.e., marine debris, which can invariably deleteriously affect both sea and land, inter alia). These new “significant effects” could warrant a supplemental environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. The revised COP and approval letter notes that certain conditions were added, but does not indicate that analysis beyond the original Environmental Impact Statement’s scope…

“It is apparent that grave analytical deficiencies exist in the revised COP and the underlying federal permit approvals for Vineyard Wind 1, among those include the failure to prepare a supplemental environmental impact statement to assess the impacts of blade failures,” said Thomas Stavola Jr. Esq., attorney for ACK for Whales.

BOEM also did not analyze the causes of the blade failure – as was required. – BOEM did not make clear whether the revised COP was as specific as federal rules demand, and did not solicit or consider adequate public comment, the letter says.

“We’ve asked the government for months to answer our questions,” Oliver said, “but they continually stall. Although they finally agreed to hold a public meeting, they delayed and then postponed that meeting indefinitely, despite receiving hundreds of questions from concerned citizens.”

“Not only was the public ignored in the approval process for the revised COP, but there was also no public notice whatsoever until the approval announcement was made in a press release,” Oliver said. “We hope Secretary Burgum will direct the agencies to take a hard look at this environmentally unsound and unsafe project.”

About ACK for Whales

ACK for Whales is a group of Nantucket community members who are concerned about the negative impacts of offshore wind development off the south shores of our beloved Island. The Massachusetts/Rhode Island wind area is bigger than the state of Rhode Island and will ultimately be occupied by 2,400 turbines, each taller than the John Hancock building in Boston, connected by thousands of miles of high voltage cables. There are many unanswered questions, and the permitting of these massive utility projects has happened largely out of the public eye. We provide a community group of neighbors and friends, who all love the same place.

Contacts

Media:

Mark Herr

203-517-8957

Mark@MarkHerrCommunications.net

#FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM